Evidence an auditor will accept, produced as a by-product of testing.
Control-by-control status mapped to recognised mobile security standards, with the underlying evidence attached — assembled from real test runs rather than written up afterwards.
The problems this solves
The specific friction this role hits, and what the workbench does about it.
Reports written after the fact
Coverage is generated from what was actually executed, with the evidence retained alongside each control.
Standards mapped by hand
OWASP MASVS controls and MASTG test references are attached to findings as they are produced.
Code leaving your environment
Analysis can run inside your own environment, so source and binaries do not need to be uploaded to a third party.
No record of who did what
Access and activity are recorded centrally, so an enquiry can be answered without reconstructing history.
What you get
- MASVS / MASTG control mapping
- Evidence retained with each finding
- Analysis inside your own environment
- Auditor-ready export formats
Why testing happens on a real rooted device
Analysis of an uploaded file can only tell you so much, and many applications behave differently — or refuse to run at all — when they detect an emulator, root, or instrumentation. AppAuditor runs the application in a real rooted device environment with a hardened profile and a full Frida instrumentation playground, so you can observe what the app actually does at runtime. Coverage is broad; some heavily hardened applications still resist analysis, and the reports say so rather than implying otherwise.
One platform, every role
The same workbench, entered from whichever door fits your job.
See it against your own app
Upload a build, run an analysis, and look at the evidence yourself.