Catch the security regression before the release, not after it.
Run a headless scan on every build, compare against a known-good baseline, and fail the pipeline only on what the change actually introduced.
The problems this solves
The specific friction this role hits, and what the workbench does about it.
Security review as a release blocker
Scanning runs in CI on each build instead of waiting for a review window.
An existing backlog that fails every build
Baseline comparison gates on findings the change introduced, so a legacy backlog does not block every release.
Results nobody can read
Standard machine-readable output that plugs into the pipeline and the code-scanning views your team already uses.
No device, no test
Headless static scanning needs no device at all; the runtime layer is there when you want deeper checks.
What you get
- Runs in CI on every build
- Baseline diff — only new findings gate
- Standard machine-readable reports
- Clear exit codes for the pipeline
Why testing happens on a real rooted device
Analysis of an uploaded file can only tell you so much, and many applications behave differently — or refuse to run at all — when they detect an emulator, root, or instrumentation. AppAuditor runs the application in a real rooted device environment with a hardened profile and a full Frida instrumentation playground, so you can observe what the app actually does at runtime. Coverage is broad; some heavily hardened applications still resist analysis, and the reports say so rather than implying otherwise.
One platform, every role
The same workbench, entered from whichever door fits your job.
See it against your own app
Upload a build, run an analysis, and look at the evidence yourself.